Whose park?

March 28, 2016

A homeless person sleeps on equipment at Othello Playground, half a block from Seattle’s newest city-sanctioned homeless camp, Othello Village.

One of the questions surrounding homeless camps – sanctioned or otherwise – is whether they attract homeless people to the neighborhoods around the camps. No studies have been done on this that I’m aware of, but with the camp located in my Highland Park neighborhood I noticed that there was a noticeable increase in the number of people loitering about in the area of the camp during the two and a half long years it was there. In some cases, these were people who slept in the camp but spent their days panhandling; in others they were people had been ejected from the camp for drugs or behavior issues and who chose to stick around in the vicinity, usually because they had friends in the camp who helped them in some way, with donations of food, for instance. In still other cases, homeless people migrated to the area because they’d heard about it on the news and because they assumed that the neighborhood was amenable. [Read a related story here.]

The managers of Othello Village have assured neighbors that they will be policing activity of campers as they move about in the neighborhood. There is a prohibition on campers buying or drinking alcohol within a certain distance of the camp, for instance, and there is another on campers associating with people who have been evicted. But such restrictions are hard enough for the management to enforce on current campers; there is no way they can be enforced on evictees or hangers on. (The person in the picture above may have been someone ejected or turned away from Othello Village who assumed, reasonably enough, that homelessness would be more likely to be tolerated in this neighborhood than elsewhere.)

Who will take responsibility for ensuring that Othello Village doesn’t attract more homeless people to the neighborhood around the camp? Will the outfit running the camp step up? How can they when it runs contrary to their stated mission of “helping the homeless”? How about camp supporters? Will they put pressure on the police and City Hall to make sure homeless people stay out of the surrounding area? Again, it doesn’t seem likely, given that they have already expressed sympathy for the plight of homeless people. Hard to imagine someone busting on a bum at the a park on Saturday while he’s handing out blankets and coffee down the street on Sunday.

That leaves the skeptical neighbors who opposed the project in the first place . . . and Seattle city officials. Those are the same officials, by the way, who told the neighbors they had to accept the camp whether they liked it or not. [See a related story here.] But wait. Hold on! Because in this case I actually have a Stump-the-Cynic happy ending for you . . .

In this particular case, the city did do the right thing. When the neighbor who took this photo passed it along to Jenny Frankl at Seattle’s Department of Neighborhoods, Ms. Frankl got right on it, and the person was gone from the park just a few hours later.

Hopefully that person got hooked up with a shelter and/or some city services . . . if that’s indeed what they were looking for.

–Story by David Preston. Photo by Pete Mahowald

Share with:

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Whose park?

  1. rats in a cage says:

    The camp cleared and cleaned earlier this year, southeast of the I5 ramp to 90 east, is starting to get built up again. Saw a homesteader stake his/her claim with a tent within the last few days. BNSF had to stop trains to clean up tracks in Ballard within the last few days. Bang up job Mr. Mayor. #whackamole

  2. JohnnyB says:

    Tents and encampments are an unacceptable alternative to “shelter”, but the truth is Seattle has more homeless than there is shelter or bed space for. Regardless of the reason for this, the cause for the increase in homeless can be a whole discussion on its own, the problem persists and will continue to escalate. Yes there will be more homeless here next year than there is now, unless Seattle establishes an EFFECTIVE, Lasting, solution. Tents are unacceptable but they are better than a doorway or a park bench. In another post I have explained there are five overarching reasons for homelessness.
    1. Mental Disability
    2. Physical Disability
    3. Addiction
    4. Life style choice, consider homelessness, “alternative housing”, LAZY
    5. Circumstance, (i.e. lost a job then couldn’t pay rent, domestic violence, etc),
    or some combination there of.

    Those individuals with mental or physical disabilities will never work or pay rent again in their lives, and we will house them for free and give them money. The only taxes they will ever pay are on purchases. Are you aware that thousands of individuals form foreign countries get to come to America, get housing, free money, and never become a citizen. Immigrants used to come to America for the opportunity to prosper but now they come for welfare. Huge, new, low income housing communities up and down MLK are dedicated to housing immigrants all the while we are neglecting actual American Citizens.

    So when you see that bum in the park, Just remember You created the condition for that kind of crap. Its not SHARE’s fault, SHARE is just responding to your failure.

  3. Walking Dead was CRAZY. With the other prisoners (especially the one with the long hair!), and Hershel being resuscitated by Lori after that scary bit! And the Zombie surgery practice?? So much better than last season!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *